Why a .22 may be the best home defense weapon

Ruger 10/22But Graywolf, How can a .22 be the best home defense weapon?

To defend your home, you need to be able to stop an attacker. In order to stop him, you need to hit him or to make him want to leave. We’ve been told for years that you need to have a big gun with a big bullet that can pierce through armor in order to defend your home. Who are you defending yourself against, Spetnaz? Let’s get real for a minute.

So I hear some of you saying:

But I’ve been told for years that you need to get a big gun with lots of stopping power and big bullets. One shot one kill. Armor. Mass and velocity. Lots of other buzzwords and statistics that sound pretty convincing

In some situations: yes. In most situations, no.

No, no, no. You need at least a 12-gauge shotgun or a .223. A .308 would even be better. You aren’t carrying a .22 with you over in Afghanistan right now, are you? Have you turned into one of those liberal anti-gun activists now?

Kiss my ass

Yeah, I have an M-16 and a 92FS on me but I’m not here trying to defend myself against a thug trying to break into my home. When I’m home I’m in the same boat as you.

The Army uses .50cal, .308. .556, 9mm, .45 and whatever else because they are the best against different targets with different defensive and offensive capabilities in different environments. I highly doubt the Taliban is gonna come in and steal your collection of Playboys.  What you need to do is stop listening to everybody’s posturing and listen to what makes sense.

So let’s break this down military-style with a pseudo-Operations Order, or OPORD. I’m not gonna draft the whole thing up as an official-looking one because quite frankly, I don’t have the time and you don’t need it. There are plenty of FM’s and websites that will tell you how to do a proper OPORD.

Basically, a miltary OPORD has five major sections:

  1. Situation
  2. Mission
  3. Execution
  4. Service and Support
  5. Command and Signal

1. Situation

Situation normally breaks down into three sections:

  • Enemy
  • Friendly
  • Attachments/Detachments
So let’s look at the situation.

Enemy

The enemy in this case is most likely going to be a robber, murderer or a rapist. If you’re looking to defend yourself against anything else then this isn’t the article for you. Go back to your fantasy world because you’re trying to prep for a scenario that is highly unlikely.

Should you prepare yourself for a home invasion by an attacker with armor or a group of marauders hell-bent on taking your supplies in a SHTF or TEOTWAWKI scenario?

I believe you should. The problem that I see with most preppers, even advanced preppers, is that they focus primarily on the worst-case scenario at the expense of the most likely scenario. All you need to do is a quick Risk Assessment to know that your focus is out of whack.

The truth is that you are more likely to face an enemy in your home who isn’t all that prepared and isn’t all that well-trained. Whether they’ll be armed will depend highly on where you live. Your most likely assailant could either be an unarmed punk or a group of gangbangers. Plan accordingly.

So, in almost all cases, your enemy won’t have body armor.

Will a weapon that stops someone with body armor work against someone without? Yes, but strangely enough, not as well in some cases. A bullet that enters the body and expends all of its energy inside, without exiting, can actually be more effective at killing someone, especially if the round expands or the shock wave does enough damage to disrupt vital organs inside. A bullet that just goes in and out at full speed and takes all the energy with it doesn’t do any more damage than just poking a hole through someone the size of a pencil.

It’s absolutely true that a .22 won’t likely expand very far and won’t have a large shockwave to disrupt organs, but that’s not the only goal of shooting at someone.

Your enemy most likely won’t be well-trained in combat tactics.

Ok, I don’t have statistics to give you on this one but it probably wouldn’t be that difficult to research. Let me know what you find out. I’d say that most likely, the guy who breaks into your home has either little or no military experience and if they do, they probably aren’t very good at CQB.

What does this mean to you? Thugs who break into homes are usually expecting to find sheeple at home who will capitulate or will be easily subdued, especially if you live in a city with strict gun control laws. They don’t want to get killed so they’ll usually run off peeing themselves if rounds start flying. They probably won’t even know what caliber weapon you have anyway. All they know is they bit off more than they could chew and they gotta pop smoke.

Friendly

This is where gotta do your own self assessment. Sun Tzu said:

Pages: 1 2 3

  • http://twitter.com/SchemaByte SchemaByte

    Simply excellent. I had the thought of doing an article on this topic, and I’m glad I hadn’t gotten to it – you’ve done a fantastic job with this and I hope that your other readers take this to heart.

  • graywolfsurvival

    Thanks brother. I’ve been a closet prepper for years; long before I knew there was a movement. Now that I’ve had a chance to do some looking at what’s for people, Almost all I see is a bunch of shit that’s been regurgitated by people who have no idea what they’re talking about because they want to get their 300-word clump of keywords out there.

    What I like about schemabyte.com is that you’re clear as to what your opinions are and you don’t try to just write mamby-pamby articles to suckle the masses. I especially enjoyed your article about how people don’t owe you anything.

    My article was mainly a statement about that more than anything after getting an email for help from one of my readers who had just purchased weapons but didn’t know what to do next or how he should have chosen them in the first place. It kind of set me off, especially after digging into what’s been written in the “mainstream” prepper sites and then echoed in the forums.

    • http://twitter.com/SchemaByte SchemaByte

      You’re on-spot with that – I monitor over a 100 prepper feeds now and let me tell you, they all repeat like mad. One person does an article on rabbits or whatever, over the next three days I wade through 25 of them. Good thing I like rabbits. :)

      Thanks for your kind words about the site; I don’t have nearly the time to dedicate to it that I wish I did, but I do try to keep it real and in parallel with my personal journey. You’ve definitely got a good thing started here, keep up the great work amigo.

      • graywolfsurvival

        Mmm. Rabbits is good eatin!

        • http://twitter.com/SchemaByte SchemaByte

          No argument from me on that one! :)

      • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-Schoemann/758619965 Scott Schoemann

        I STOPPED reading most “prepper” sites because they are full of the “I’m better than you are” and the same old regurgitated tripe. I’m 54 years old and was BORN INTO this lifestyle. Literally. I never knew it even had a name until the word survivalist became synonymous with anti government whack job… I came here because I saw something different. not the “SOS”… Hope it keeps going. there is too much to teach and for people to learn. and it isn’t just about TEOTWAWKI. It’s about living life, NO MATTER WHERE IT GOES

  • Pingback: 272 Notable Prepper Links in January 2013 - SchemaByte

  • Julio

    What are you talking about, “full auto” and “three round burst” you have been playing way to much CoD. Who has a fully auto rifle? The paperwork to get one and also the price is insane. Why is it the only semi auto you refer to a .22? What about all the other rifle and handguns, not to mention semi auto shotguns. Oh that would hurt your case. Also I like how you compare the advantage of having a light, easy to maneuver .22, to lugging around a .50 in your home. What about a hand gun in 9mm, 40sw, or even 45acp. Those are light and easy to maneuver. Then at the end you really made me laugh. You were referring to a .22lr rifle this whole time. I would much rather have a handgun than a rifle or shotgun in my house. I only need one hand on the weapon. Which gives me a free hand to: feel around in the dark, help keep my balance, bloke a hit, and even keep room between myself and said intruder. That is why I use an XD40 with Gold Dot Hallow points.

    • graywolfsurvival

      I know about 10 people who have fully auto weapons. Does the terminology scare you or something that you’d have to start insults about CoD? I’ve been to four combat zones so far and fought in two of them – and you? If you bother to read the whole article and not take things out of context as I mentioned people would do, you’d see that I gave concessions to the other weapons. Given certain situations, the .22 shouldn’t be discounted.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-Schoemann/758619965 Scott Schoemann

      First off I own them Legally, and while I too disagree with the .22 and can supply scientific and logical arguments against them and can PROVE them to ANYONE willing to take the time to follow a simple scientific experiment. You need to be dealt with as a detractor of fact. And the fact is unless someone is comfortable with a handgun, they CAN NOT SAFELY USE ONE. it is that simple. And here is another fact if you thing that under stress you can use a single hand grip and be accurate, I don’t want to be in the same county with you when you shoot, YOU are too dangerous to be around, especially when handling a firearm without an external manual safety.

  • Pingback: .22 for home defense???

  • http://www.facebook.com/gaelan.larkinsford Gaelan Larkins-Ford

    I think you may have misinterpreted some of the conclusions from the buckeye arms paper. If i read it correctly he has a completely seperate catagory for rifles so his data on the .22lr there is from pistols. Your article is fantastic though and really made me think about how i would defend myself and my loved ones. Being on a budget (read poor) addressing training and muscle memory really makes me think about the .22 a lot more seriously. That SR40c wont do me any good if i cant afford to take it to the range every week. A ruger 10/22 takedown is definately on my christmas list this year.

  • graywolfsurvival

    Great show by your son, and by you by teaching him to fight.

    As far as ammo goes, there are better penetrating and killing rounds than a .22 but in the right circumstances, given someone who has little or no training, a .22 may be the best weapon overall. I still like the fragmenting rounds for the house so you don’t kill the neighbors but hollow points are definitely better than parabellum ones. They just aren’t going to go through any kind of armor.

  • http://twitter.com/RoninM MRonin ⚜

    Great article. This is something I’ve been hollering about to anyone who would listen for a while now. Yes larger caliber have their place and are very effective as well as necessary on some scenarios. However an overwhelmingly large portion of the scenarios that we all may face some day are best benefitted by the simple effectiveness of a .22. Having been in the unenviable position of needing to defend home and family more than a few times I can say with certainty that both the humble .22 as well as larger caliber guns have saved our bacon. It’s why the .22 is the only gun I’d really count on in a SHTF scenerio.

  • http://www.facebook.com/collins.coe Colleen Coe

    I love this article! Seriously! A .22 is just right for most situations. Ammo is relatively cheap and you’re best off with a gun you’ve shot a 1000 times then some expensive ammo ‘impress the guys at the shooting club’ beast that you’ve shot twice. So often survivalist think that they’ll morph into Agent .007 or Chuck Norris when and if something happens, when in reality moderation and realism are much, much more effective planning strategies.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Scott-Schoemann/758619965 Scott Schoemann

      While I venomously disagree with the .22 for self defense… you are spot on, with the rest. Way too many fools think simply owning makes them experts. While I’ve shot everything under the sun, there are things I refuse to shoot again because of many reasons, but the most common is viability. if you cant handle it and with accuracy. look for something else. BUT make sure IT is up to the job you need it to do, and that means YOU need to know the physiology of the living target you are shooting in order to dispatch it properly, be it hunting or defensively.

GraywolfSurvival.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to (“your website name” (amazon.com, or endless.com, MYHABIT.com, SmallParts.com, or AmazonWireless.com).